Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Naucratic Expeditions's avatar

Thank you for this reflection. It has sometimes been my experience that theologians and philosophers who are rich in metaphysics have a certain poverty or methodological indifference when it comes to questions of politics and political theology. This and your reflections on the Constantinian Shift demonstrate this does not have to be the case.

Expand full comment
ALLHEART's avatar

A well-structured reflection with poignant anecdotes, Dr. Wood. The continued hegemonic presence of Zionism in American foreign policy circles (and thus in the foreign policy structures of the world) remains utterly bizarre in its disproportion to anything needful in terms of realpolitik - as has been thoroughly illustrated by the likes of John Mearsheimer, Stephen Walt, and Grant F. Smith - and yet moreso in terms ethical; I would propose this bizarre disproportion is the result of the bizarre character of the 20th century, wherein emerged other abnormal (and abnormally homicidal) states, namely the Soviet Union and the Third Reich, and with which the State of Israel emerged together from a common nexus of historical causality. Yuri Slezkine, Ernst Nolte, and Hannah Arendt are helpful here. The good news is such embeddedness in 20th century dialectical processes cannot grant a lasting (or even lastingly intelligible) mandate to the State of Israel in the minds of the young, born without said embeddedness in 20th century dialectical processes. Bad news is the State of Israel is not going quietly into that good night of historically-boundedness and loss of relevance and will continue to drench the soil with the Blood for which the soil cries out, and as we know, to kill one man is to kill all mankind. I pray this Blood speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.

- Coltrane F., telosbound

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts